Comparison table of technical and economic analysis of steel truss purlins and cold-formed thin-walled Z purlins - general working conditions |
||||
Steel truss purlin |
Z-shaped purlin |
Steel truss purlin |
Z-shaped purlin |
|
Bay Spacing |
12m |
|||
Spacing |
1500mm |
1500mm |
1500mm |
1500mm |
Bay Spacing |
PSJ-R500K01 |
XZ300*80*25*2.3/3.0 |
PSJ-R600K02 |
XZ300*85*25*2.8/3.3 |
Material |
Q420 |
Q345B |
Q420 |
Q345B |
Normal load |
Dead load:0.2KN/㎡;Live
load:0.5KN/㎡;Wind load:0.3KN/㎡; |
Dead load:0.2KN/㎡;Live load:0.5KN/㎡;Wind load:0.35KN/㎡; |
||
Steel consumption for linear meters |
8.366kg/m |
10.373kg/m |
9.63kg/m |
13.048kg/m |
Steel consumption per square meter |
5.577kg/m*m |
6.915kg/m*m |
6.42kg/m*m |
8.699kg/m*m |
Conclusion |
For the roof system with 12m column
spacing,
under the same load requirements,
the use of Peterson purlins can
save up to 19% of the steel
consumption than the cold-formed thin-walled C.Z
purlins.
|
For a roof system
with a column spacing of 12m, |
Comparison of technical and economic analysis of steel truss purlins and cold-formed thin-walled Z purlins - main line conditions |
||||
Steel truss purlin |
Z-shaped purlin |
Steel truss purlin |
Z-shaped purlin |
|
Bay Spacing |
12m |
|||
Spacing |
1500mm |
1500mm |
1500mm |
1500mm |
Bay Spacing |
PSJ-R500K02 |
(2)XZ300*80*25*2.0/2.3 |
PSJ-R600K03 |
(2)XZ300*85*25*2.3/2.8 |
Material |
Q420 |
Q345B |
Q420 |
Q345B |
Load requirements |
Dead load:0.2KN/㎡;Live
load:0.5KN/㎡;Wind load:0.3KN/㎡; |
Dead load:0.2KN/㎡;Live load:0.5KN/㎡;Wind load:0.35KN/㎡; |
||
Special load |
Main line load:180kg/m |
Main line load:240kg/m |
||
Steel consumption for linear meters |
9.26kg/m |
17.742kg/m |
10.62kg/m |
21.826kg/m |
Steel consumption per square meter |
6.173kg/m*m |
11.828kg/m*m |
7.08kg/m*m |
14.551kg/m*m |
Conclusion |
For main line hanging, the special
suspension system
of Peterson steel truss purlin can save 48% of steel.
And
in the installation of mechanical and electrical
equipment in the process of
eliminating the traditional
installation process of the necessary air welding
and drilling.
|
For main line hanging, Z-purlins must be
suspended by 4 purlins,
and special suspension system of Peterson steel truss
purlins is used.
Only 2 purlins are suspended, saving 51% of steel.
And in
the installation of mechanical and electrical
equipment in the process of
eliminating the traditional
installation process of the necessary air welding
and drilling.
|
Technical and economic analysis comparison table of steel truss purlin and |
||||
Steel truss purlin |
High frequency welding H-shaped rigid purlin |
Steel truss purlin |
High frequency welding H-shaped rigid purlin |
|
Column distance |
12m |
15m |
||
Spacing |
1500mm |
1500mm |
1500mm |
1500mm |
Section size |
PSJ-R500K01 |
H350*150*3.2*4.5 |
PSJ-R650K02 |
H350*150*4.5*6 |
Material |
Q420 |
Q345 |
Q420 |
Q345 |
Load |
Dead load: 0.2KN/㎡; Live load: 0.5KN/㎡; Wind load: 0.45KN/㎡; Snow load: 0.45KN/㎡;Suspension load: 0.3KN/㎡ |
|||
Steel consumption for linear meters |
8.366kg/m |
17.91kg/m |
9.82kg/m |
24.3kg/m |
Steel consumption per square meter |
5.577kg/m*m |
11.94kg/m*m |
6.547kg/m*m |
16.2kg/m*m |
Expanded area (m*m) |
11.3 |
15.6 |
14.6 |
19.5 |
In conclusion |
For the roof system with 12m column spacing,
The use of Peterson steel truss purlins saves up to 53% |
For the roof system with 15m column spacing,
The use of Peterson steel truss purlins saves up to 60% of the |
||
It can be seen from the above data that under the same load, the higher the column spacing requirement,
At the same time, it can save more than 25% of the fireproof coating area and more Because the Peterson hollow steel truss purlin system has a special suspension system, it saves the air welding and drilling necessary for traditional installation during the electromechanical equipment installation process, thereby saving more than 30% of the labor cost of the electromechanical contractor. |